Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Psychology Students During the Rigid Ruarantine by Covid-19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v11i1.193

Main Article Content

Landaeta-Mendoza, C.
BO
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0297-7029

Abstract

In the training processes, it is necessary to reinforce empathy, which is considered a fundamental aspect and sufficiently relevant to be considered for its evaluation in a specific way. The present research studied the effects of rigid quarantine on empathic capacity from a cognitive and affective approach, both in assessing the empathic process and in the interpretation of its four specific scales: adoption of perspectives, emotional understanding, empathic stress, and joy. In psychology, students are in the middle of their professional training within a private university. The study was based on the quantitative approach, which contemplates a contemporary transactional descriptive research design and uses a discretionary non-probabilistic sample. For the present investigation, the students who were recurrent in their participation in virtual classes were selected. The information collection was through applications of the Cognitive and Affective Empathy Test; the study was carried out during rigid pandemic quarantine by Covid-19. The items were transcribed into an electronic form, using Microsoft Forms tools, after contextualizing and adapting them to the Bolivian context. It identified that the pandemic situation affected the empathic characteristics of the students, mainly: the ability to put one in the other's shoes, as well as the ability to share the positive emotions of another person.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Landaeta-Mendoza, C. J. (2021). Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Psychology Students During the Rigid Ruarantine by Covid-19. Docentes 2.0 Journal, 11(1), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v11i1.193
Section
Articles

Citaciones del Artículo



References

Álvarez, P., Carrasco, M., & Fustos, J. (2010). Relación de la empatía y género en la conducta prosocial y agresiva, en adolescentes de distintos tipos de establecimientos educacionales. Revista Iberoamericana De Psicología, 3(2), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.33881/2027-1786.rip.3203

Álvarez-Ovallos, A., Gélvez-López, A., & Mosquera-Téllez, J. (2020). Conflicto Escolar en la Educación Rural del Nororiente de Colombia. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 9(2), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i2.135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i2.135

Angulo, G., Guerra, V., Blanco, Y., & Méndez, T., (2019). Características de la comprensión emocional en escolares cubanos de 8-10 años. Perspectc, Educ. Vol 58. N°3. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Valparaiso. http://dx.doi.org/10.4151/07189729-vol.58-iss.3-art.843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4151/07189729-Vol.58-Iss.3-Art.843

Balart, M. (2013). La empatía, la clave para conectar con los demás, Observatorio de recursos humano. 79, 86-87. http://www.gref.org/nuevo/articulos/art_250513.pdf

Batson, C. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it every truly altruistic? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 20, pp.65-122. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60412-8

Bisquera, R. (2016). 19 ideas clave Educación Emocional. Graó.

Castillo, P. (2012) Nivel de empatía de los estudiantes practicantes de psicología clínica (Estudio realizado con estudiantes practicantes de licenciatura en psicología clínica de la Universidad Rafael Landívar y Mariano Gálvezn [Tesis de Licenciatura, Universidad Nacional de Colombia]. http://biblio3.url.edu.gt/Tesis/2012/05/42/Castillo-Pedro.pdf

Diaz, V. (2014). Empatía en estudiantes de enfermería de la Universidad mator, Sede Temuco, IX región chile. vol.14, n.3, pp.388-402. ISSN 1657-5997. http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2014.14.3.9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2014.14.3.9

Hernández, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. Universidad de Celaya.

Hurtado, J. (1998). Metodología de la Investigación Holística. Instituto Universitario de Tecnología Caripito.

López, B., Fernández, I., & Abad, F. (2008). Test de Empatía Cognitiva y Afectiva. TEA Ediciones.

Peng, W., Lee, M., & Heeter, C. (2010). The effects of a serious game on role-taking and willingness to help. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 723-742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01511.x

Requena, B. (2014). Muestreo no probabilístico, https://www.universoformulas.com/estadistica/inferencia/muestreo-no-probabilistico/

Reyes, M., & Rodríguez, H. (2018). La adopción de perspectiva y la comunicación de la responsabilidad social corporativa: una revisión conceptual. Vol. XXVI (2), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.18359/rfce.2888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18359/rfce.2888

Tintaya, P. (2014). Proyecto de investigación. Instituto de Estudios Bolivianos.

Únete a nuestro canal de Telegram para recibir notificaciones de nuestras publicaciones