Classification of Digital Tools in Technoeducation DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v1i1.257

Main Article Content

Mujica-Sequera, R.
OM
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2602-5199

Abstract

The emergence and advancement of technology in the last decade of the 20th century opens up new opportunities for the educational process. The purpose of this research was to determine the classification and the evolution of digital tools to optimize the pedagogical model of the virtual classroom Teachers 2.0, this being a safe, motivational and experiential tool in the didactic-pedagogical task. A diagnosis was applied, benefited from a methodology according to the study objectives, being awarded a type of descriptive research in a field design. A questionnaire was used for a population of 35 respondents (5 teachers, 30 students), the data were tabulated, they also deciphered and externalized the results through tables of relative frequency distributions, in addition, the percentages for each indicator, reflected using graphics; providing answers to the study questions. Consequently, the reached conclusions and recommendations constitute the contribution and importance; in turn, it was possible to reveal the weaknesses in the Virtual Classroom in terms of the ignorance of classification and even characteristics of the digital tools by the students. Specialist teachers. At the same time, an established “precedent”  about studying educational, technological resources.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Mujica-Sequera, R. M. (2021). Classification of Digital Tools in Technoeducation. Docentes 2.0 Journal, 12(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v1i1.257
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Mujica-Sequera, R., Docentes Group 2.0 C.A

Ruth Mujica is Venezuelan and has been living in the Middle East since 2011. She studied Industrial Engineering and Systems Engineering (Cum Laude) Degree Work: Honorable Mention. Ruth has a master’s degree in University Teaching (Summa Cum Laude) Degree Work: Honorable Mention and master’s degree in Software Engineering, University Teaching Specialization (Summa Cum Laude), Doctorate in Educational Technology (Summa Cum Laude) Degree Work: Honorable Mention and Post-doctorate in Science (Summa Cum Laude). She has been an Educational Coach, a systemic therapist in Neurolinguistic Programming, Transpersonal Psychology, applied in the educational field, and a Microsoft Certified Innovative Educator (MIE) since 2015. Ruth is the Chief Director of the Docentes 2.0 Magazines of Grupo Docentes 2.0 C.A. and Co-Editor of the UNESCA Panama Magazine. She has also served as editor-in-chief of other scientific journals, including the REVECITEC Magazine of Dr. Rafael Belloso Chacín University, known as URBE, until 2020.
Ruth has served for more than ten years at the Technological-Educational level; she is the Founder and CEO of the DOCENTES 2.0 Project ® of GRUPO DOCENTES 2.0 CA. She is the National Ambassador of Venezuela recognized by ReviewerCredits, with the mission of collaborating in favor of improvement, recognition, and certification of the referees of scientific journals worldwide in the peer-review process. She, as well as she, has received multiple recognitions among them: the Yacambú Order in Second Class in 2020 for her outstanding work and contribution in the management for the production of scientific knowledge and techno-educational innovation; UJAP recognition for being an enthusiastic, preserving, tenacious, promoter and collaborator in the application of ICT; Recognition as Latin American Ambassador for Educational Technology recognized by the Mar de Cortés University Center; and she is currently ranked #4 in ReviewerCredits International Reviewer. In addition, Ruth has extended the systemic theory application to students, teachers, and parents, among whom the benefits reach extraordinary levels. Her project Her teacher 2.0 of her arose in 2013, thanks to her assignments when she was studying the specialization in Distance Education; really, the purpose of this great project was to create an academic space, to produce and share knowledge about education betting on the quality of learning. This educational space is designed to help the evolution of traditional teachers, who have been left with an outdated role in advancing technology in education and learning. She has to date a little more than 1900 technological-educational articles of her authorship, 47 publications in an indexed journal, four published books, and has participated in the review of more than 100 scientific articles in the process by peers. She is recognized as a tenacious, visionary researcher and deeply committed to education for life, as she points out that it is pertinent to remember that "Education must begin in the family, continue in school and consolidate throughout life."

Citaciones del Artículo



References

Ander-Eggs, E. (1987). Técnicas de investigación social. Editorial Humanitas.

Arias, F. (1999). El Proyecto de Investigación: Guía para la Elaboración (3ª. ed.). Editorial Episteme.

Baechle, T. R., Earle, R. W. (2007). Principios del entrenamiento de la fuerza y el acondicionamiento físico. 2ª edición. Editorial Médica Panamericana.

Bavarezco, A. (1997). Proceso Metodológico de la Investigación: Cómo Hacer un Diseño de Investigación. Imprenta Internacional C.A.

Bisquerra, R. (1998). Método de Investigación Educativa. España: CEAC.

Cabero, J. (1998). Usos de los Medios Audiovisuales, Informáticos y las Nuevas Tecnologías en los Centros Andaluces. Grupo de Investigación Didáctica.

Depreau, C. (1997). Aprendizaje Total. Editorial Kapaluz.

Henderson, J. (1992). Reflective Teaching: Becoming an Inquiring Educator. Mac Millan.

Méndez, C. (2003). Metodología. Diseño y desarrollo del proceso de investigación. (3ª ed.). McGraw-Hill Interamericana Editores S.A.

Mujica-Sequera, R. [Docentes 2.0] (2020). Educación a distancia en tiempo de pandemia [video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/Qsi0F4HOaOQ

Mujica-Sequera, R. (2016). Estrategia audiovisual en la optimización del modelo pedagógico e-learning. Grupo Docentes 2.0 C.A.

Palella-Stracuzzi, S. & Martins-Pestana, F. (2012). Metodología de la investigación cuantitativa. 3ra Edición. FEDUPEL.

Sabino, C. (1986). Metodología de la investigación. https://bianneygiraldo77.wordpress.com/category/capitulo-iii/

Sabino, C. (2002). El Proceso de Investigación. Editorial Panapo.

Seisdedos, N. (2004). Cambios.T est de flexibilidad cognitiva. TEA ediciones.

Stake, R. E. (2005). Investigación con estudio de casos. Morata.

Yin, R. (2009). Case Study Research, desing and mhetods. (Fourth edition). SAGE.

Únete a nuestro canal de Telegram para recibir notificaciones de nuestras publicaciones