Design of a Rubric to Evaluate non-Written Instruments with ICT in the Competence-Based Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v18i1.596
Main Article Content
Abstract
Creating a research project is challenging over time since simultaneously, philosophical currents of thought are constantly changing, given the evolution of a technology that invades human development and threatens to replace the individual with a computer, which facilitates work. The purpose of the research was to Design the Evaluation Rubric for Non-Written Instruments Supported by Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in a career Based on a Competence Approach, specifically for the course of Sampling Techniques and Basic Statistics, to determine the resources and means necessary to evaluate knowledge and skills with the appropriate means. From the methodological point of view, it was framed within the positivist paradigm, with a quantitative approach of non-experimental descriptive design. The population consulted was fifteen professors of the career, who answered a survey as a support element to achieve the objectives, framing the development of the work in a phase scheme. Using the documentary review, the results of the questionnaire, and the evaluation of the program, the elements that the rubric should contain were determined, ending with its development and indicating how it should be implemented.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
Acosta, P. & Díaz, I. (2005). Programa del Curso de Técnicas de Muestreo y Estadística Básica. Creación de la Carrera de Ingeniería de Procesos Industriales. Escuela de Ingeniería de Procesos Industriales. Facultad de Ingeniería. Universidad Central de Venezuela.
Arias, F. (2012). El proyecto de la Investigación. Introducción a la Investigación Científica (Sexta Edición). Editorial Episteme.
Babativa, C. (2017). Investigación Cuantitativa. Revista Areandina, (1). 46 – 62. https://n9.cl/pwblq DOI: https://doi.org/10.33132/9789585459007
Barrios, R., O., (2018). Uso de Rúbrica. Una Guía para el Profesor. Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana. https://n9.cl/rvg9k
Bernal, T., & Augusto, C. (2010). Metodología de la Investigación (Tercera Edición). Editorial Prentice Hall.
Cano, M. C., & Ordoñez, E. J. (2021). Formación del profesorado en Latinoamérica. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXVII (2), 284-295. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v27i2.35915 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v27i2.35915
Gamarra-Mendoza, F. (2019). La aplicabilidad de la evaluación por competencias en los escenarios universitarios. Prohominum. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, 2(1). https://n9.cl/9q8okh DOI: https://doi.org/10.47606/prohominum.v2i1.66
Guillén, A (2021). Modelo del plan evaluativo para un curso diseñado bajo el esquema educación basada en competencias. Repositorio Saber UCV. https://n9.cl/ev3ce
Herrera, J. (2018). Las prácticas investigativas contemporáneas. Los retos de sus nuevos planteamientos epistemológicos. Revista Scientific. Instituto Internacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnologico Educativo (INDITEC). 3(7). 6 – 15. https://n9.cl/iso5p5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29394/Scientific.issn.2542-2987.2018.3.7.0.6-15
Hincapíe, N., & Clemenza, C. (2022), Evaluación de los aprendizajes por competencias: Una mirada teórica desde el contexto colombiano. Revista de Ciencias Sociales. Universidad del Zulia. 106 – 120. https://n9.cl/dfkjbr
McClelland, D. (1973). Testing for competence rather than intelligence. American Psychologist, 28.1-14. https://n9.cl/kqp89 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034092
Ramos, C., Beresaluce, R., & Peiró, S. (2016). La evaluación por competencias en la Universidad. Octaedro. https://n9.cl/ozro
Rodríguez, Á. F., Mendoza, M. M., & Cargua, N. I. (2019). El proyecto integrador de saberes, una oportunidad para aprender a aprender. Revista Digital de Educación Física, 10(57), 62-77. https://n9.cl/ha3npk
Sierra, B., R. (2007). Tesis Doctorales y Trabajos de Investigación Científica. Metodología General en su Elaboración y Documentación (Quinta Edición). Editores Thomson.
Torres, J., & Perera, V. (2010). La rúbrica como instrumentos pedagógicos para la tutorización y evaluación de los aprendizajes en el foro online en educación superior. Revista de Medios y Comunicación. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación. Universidad de Sevilla. https://n9.cl/pt3ma
Ventura-León, J. (2017). ¿Población o muestra?: Una diferencia necesaria. Revista Cubana de salud Pública. 43(4). https://n9.cl/ox05v